On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> So I don't want to give up the details of the function
>>> or operator. But sticking them at the end after a colon might make it
>>> clearer that the func/operator is referenced by the amproc or amop
>>> entry, but is not the same thing.
>
>> That seems like an improvement over the status quo, so do you want to
>> go ahead and do that?
>
> Are you voting to commit the patch I presented plus that change,
Yeah.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
