Re: is sync rep stalled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aidan Van Dyk
Subject Re: is sync rep stalled?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimJGkpqb_AP3Pfn1_jWC8zRjNUJ0yCM_k_WmjMK@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: is sync rep stalled?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: is sync rep stalled?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have one question for clarity:
>
> If we make all the transactions wait until specified standbys have
> connected to the master, how do we take a base backup from the
> master for those standbys? We seem to be unable to do that because
> pg_start_backup also waits forever. Is this right?

Well, in my *opinion*, if you've told the master to not "commit to"
*anything* unless it's synchronously replicated, you should already
have a synchronously replicating slave up and running.

I'm happy with the docs saying (maybe some what more politely): Before configuring your master to be completly,
wait-fully-synchronous, make sure you have a slave capable of being
synchronous ready.  Because if you've told it to never be
un-synchronous, it won't be.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding getrusage profiling data to EXPLAIN output
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance