Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimEVgkoYyR+cwjV9rbo81wc=kA9khps7_848j1Y@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13 September 2010 12:47, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 12:40, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Now that we have the wonderful latch facility, let's use it to reduce the
>> delay between receiving a piece of WAL and applying in the standby.
>> Currently, the startup process polls every 100ms to see if new WAL has
>> arrived, which adds an average a 50 ms delay between a transaction commit in
>> the master and it appearing as committed in a hot standby server. The latch
>> patch eliminated a similar polling delay in walsender already, the attached
>> patch does the same for walreceiver.
>>
>> After this patch, there is no unnecessary delays in the streaming
>> replication code path. Note that this is all still asynchronous, just with
>> reduced latency.
>>
>> This is pretty straightforward, but any comments?
>
> Is that supposed to be waiting 5000ms?

Ignore me, I can see that it's right.

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch