On 18 August 2010 06:30, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
<ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, again,
>
> I just had this wacky idea, and wanted to share it:
>
> what do you think of having the dataset divided among several servers,
> and sending the query to all of them, and then just have the
> application "unify" the results from all the servers?
>
> Would that work for this kind of *one table* search? (there are no
> joins, and will never be). I think it should, but: what do you think?
There is a tool for this -
http://plproxy.projects.postgresql.org/doc/tutorial.html
>
> Ildefonso.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
> <ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm analyzing the possibility of using PostgreSQL to store a huge
>> amount of data (around 1000M records, or so....), and these, even
>> though are short (each record just have a timestamp, and a string that
>> is less than 128 characters in length), the strings will be matched
>> against POSIX Regular Expressions (different regexps, and maybe
>> complex).
>>
>> Because I don't have a system large enough to test this here, I have
>> to ask you (I may borrow a medium-size server, but it would take a
>> week or more, so I decided to ask here first). How is the performance
>> of Regexp matching in PostgreSQL? Can it use indexes? My guess is:
>> no, because I don't see a way of generally indexing to match regexp :(
>> , so, tablescans for this huge dataset.....
>>
>> What do you think of this?
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ildefonso Camargo
>>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
>
--
Sergey Konoplev
Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com /
Linkedin: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp /
JID/GTalk: gray.ru@gmail.com / Skype: gray-hemp / ICQ: 29353802
