Re: hot_standby = on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: hot_standby = on
Date
Msg-id AANLkTim4V7RtwBp7duo97OwAp0jUKk9lsYFuy0VD60uU@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to hot_standby = on  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com>)
Responses Re: hot_standby = on  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com> wrote:
> The docs don't seem to contain any discussion I could find on why one might
> not want hot_standby on. Maybe it's just too obvious to most people, but
> this seems to be a bit lacking in the docs.

Well, if you don't want your slave to process queries, then you
wouldn't turn it on, presumably.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby