Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate' - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From David Schnur
Subject Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'
Date
Msg-id AANLkTilzcY_VGBiYdTJ2bomtECxJxipSyW4AcpLMsO76@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
@Julio Leyva: The table does get vacuumed at the end of the maintenance tasks; in this case it's not making it that far, of course.

@Scott Marlowe: Truncate isn't an option here, unfortunately.

I'm less concerned with the particular query than with the general question of when a shutdown could hang like this.  I expected this to be possible when using -m fast, but my understanding was that -m immediate really forced termination.

I'm setting up a test on the user's machine where it will try immediate first, rather than fast.

David

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'