On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 07 07:33:55 -0400 2010:
>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Andy Lester <andy@petdance.com> wrote:
>> > I was looking for how to undo a CLUSTER call earlier today. Nothing on
>> > the CLUSTER page told me how to do it, or pointed me to the ALTER TABLE
>> > page. I figure a pointer to would help the next person in my situation.
>>
>> I've been annoyed by this too and so am in favor of adding a mention
>> in the documentation, but I think we should mention both the CLUSTER
>> and SET WITHOUT CLUSTER variants of ALTER TABLE, and since it's only
>> one sentence I think we should add it adjacent to the existing
>> sentence discussing remembering the index. My proposed patch
>> attached; thoughts?
>
> dept. of minor nitpicks:
>
> change
> + use <literal>CLUSTER</literal> or <literal>SET WITHOUT CLUSTER</literal>
>
> to
> + use the <literal>CLUSTER ON</literal> or <literal>SET WITHOUT CLUSTER</literal>
>
> Other than that, +1 from me.
>
> (Hmm, perhaps even say what each form is for right after mentioning it, instead
> of mentioning both and then saying what both are for.)
I couldn't think of a way to phrase that that was any better than the
way I wrote it and still allowed me to include an xref to the ALTER
TABLE page in a natural way. I am however open to suggestions.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
