Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikzpg8eAkudoD3okhxN0F6pcs_jS_xouPMzb3wO@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
> Will do. Thanks for the link.
>
> Here is an updated version that works for SHARE locks too.
>
> (This message mainly serves as a way to link the updated patch to the commit fest entry. Is this how I'm supposed to
dothat, or am I doing something wrong?)
 

Yeah - just go to the existing CF entry and say "New Comment" then
select type "Patch".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE