Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support
Date
Msg-id AANLkTiks1WKj=95Ai0nDOCkWj6MwhoYFpJtnX0vFvSkA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support  (Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 21:06, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
>>>> I'll run it once for that now, and then please rebase your
>>>> patch on top of that - makes it easier to review it.
>>>
>>> The rebased patch can be grabbed from http://www.piening.info/VS2010v2.patch
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Please make sure this goes on the commitfest page
>> (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=9), so
>> it's not missed.
>>
>> I'm currently lacking an env where I can put VS2010 on it (given that
>> the amazon cloud no longer works reasonably for windows machines, and
>> I can't put another version of VS on the other VM I'm using right
>> now), so it'll be a while before I can look at this.
>
> Magnus, are you planning to get this committed for 9.1?

I'd like to, but I'm not sure I'll have the time. Per the comment from
Brar it was intended as an initial attempt not quite ready yet, so
it's not something we should hold up the CF / release for.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add ENCODING option to COPY
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity