On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe that the consensus was mostly in favor of deprecating => as
>> an operator name, with the intent to abolish it completely in a future
>> release. Attached is a patch to implement ==> as an alternative
>> operator name for hstore, and to make the backend throw a warning when
>> => is used as an operator name.
>>
>> One wart is that => is used not only as a SQL-level operator, but also
>> by hstore_in() when interpreting hstore-type literals, and by
>> hstore_out() when generating them. My gut feeling is that we should
>> leave this part alone and only muck with the SQL operator, but perhaps
>> someone will care to argue the point.
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01501.php
>
> hm. any chance of a shorter operator, like '#'? I kinda agree that
> hstore_in and the operator don't have to be the same, but requiring
> three letter token for the two most high traffic operations w/hstore
> seems off to me.
>
> # is currently used for bitwise xor/geo
I'm happy to do whatever the consensus is. I thought it would be
easier to remember if the two operators were spelled at least somewhat
similarly, but I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
