Re: max_wal_senders must die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikpdOBQGi4tnTE_eM8m+=Zi-XKfTf8xf=MoVepK@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_wal_senders must die  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: max_wal_senders must die
Re: max_wal_senders must die
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> I would also agree that the minority of our users will want replication.
>> The majority of CMD customers, PGX customers, EDB Customers will want
>> replication but that is by far NOT the majority of our (.Org) users.
>
> That just means that *you don't know* how many .org users plan to
> implement replication, whether it's a minority or majority.

None of us know.  What I do know is that I don't want PostgreSQL to be
slower out of the box.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die