Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikkOfG7wC+Fds+zm=eVd8vHZMywwbG2j3yTOCyO@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Thanks. It also explains my another question why Merge Append cannot
>> be used for UNION ALL plans.
>
> Hmm, seems like the example you show ought to work.  I wonder if there
> was an oversight in that patch...
>

Huh, that definitely worked in the earlier versions of the patch (as
much as it "worked" at all)

--
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Exposing an installation's default value of unix_socket_directory
Next
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rawdump