Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikk+0tA7zH0Er-4BHgQUSqZqpgrXxYPSuB9q8YY@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>> I despaired of this repo being anything like reliable months ago.
>> AFAIK it is using a known to be broken version of fromcvs.
>
> Could we have it pull (using git) from the repo you have working
> correctly?  (Or would that be too Rube Goldbergesque?)

It would result in a massive merge commit and the duplication of the
entire history.  The correct solution is probably to (a) install
Andrew's fixed version of the import tool on the server and (b) rewind
the history on the server so it reimports all the subsequent commits.
Sometimes doing only (b) is sufficient to correct the problem, since
the tool seems rather sensitive to ephemeral states of the
respository.

Unfortunately, (a) has not happened.  Magnus seems to feel that Andrew
has not provided sufficient details about which version he should be
running and whether it will likely break anything, and I gather that
Andrew feels otherwise.  Figuring out who is right and who is wrong
and what to do about it is above my pay grade, but it would be really
nice if someone could get this straightened out.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: Re: Explicit psqlrc
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.0, second run