2011/1/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> variant a) my first patch - detoast on first usage with avoiding to
>> useless detoast checking
>> variant b) my first patch - detoast on first usage without avoiding to
>> useless detoast checking
>>
>> time for 1 - about 300 ms, a is bout 1.5% faster than b
>> time for 2 - about 30000 ms, a is about 3% faster than b
>
> This makes your approach sound pretty good, but it sounds like we
> might need to find a better way to structure the code.
>
do you have a any idea?
Pavel
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
