Fwd: Cascading Recovery - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Selva manickaraja
Subject Fwd: Cascading Recovery
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikgxpbYPKULCjmob5FjxXdvhk83oh2C2d-j_Mwr@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cascading Recovery  (Selva manickaraja <mavles78@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Cascading Recovery  (Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Any updates?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Selva manickaraja <mavles78@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Cascading Recovery
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org


If not with Streaming Replication, what about Continous Archiving Mode?


On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
Le 11/02/2011 05:43, Selva manickaraja a écrit :
> We are considering on using a primary and 2 secondary machines. But our plan
> is to cascade the recovery as follows:
>
> 1. Primary Machine-A (read and write operation)
> 2. Secondary Machine-B (recover from Machine A)
> 3. Secondary Machine-C (recover from Machine B)
>
> We are planning this kind of recovery as we want to phase out recovery
> interval between C and B 30 minutes.
>
> Can this be achieved by PostgreSQL.
>

Not with Streaming Replication. But you can achieve this with a
different replication engine, like Slony.


--
Guillaume
 http://www.postgresql.fr
 http://dalibo.com


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Shrirang Chitnis
Date:
Subject: Re: increased load on server
Next
From: Keith Gabryelski
Date:
Subject: Re: how do you manage postgres 9's postgres process's memory