On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> I have developed a patch that partially implements the "functional
>> dependency" feature that allows some columns to be omitted from the
>> GROUP BY clause if it can be shown that the columns are functionally
>> dependent on the columns in the group by clause and therefore guaranteed
>> to be unique per group.
>
> The main objection to this is the same one I've had all along: it makes
> the syntactic validity of a query dependent on what indexes exist for
> the table. At minimum, that means that enforcing the check at parse
> time is the Wrong Thing.
It also needs to ensure that the plan is invalidated if the constraint
is dropped, which I assume amounts to the same thing.
--
greg
