On 14 August 2010 13:12, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 2010-08-08 1:45 PM +0300, I wrote:
>>
>> On 8/8/2010 12:49 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>>>
>>> For those migrating code from Oracle, providing this feature as-is
>>> might be valuable, since presumably they are not too concerned about
>>> these concurrency issues. Ideally we'd want to do better though.
>>
>> Yes, you might be right. This feature on its on can greatly simplify
>> what people now have to do to get triggers on views.
>
> This weekend I had the luxury of working with our VIEW system, and it seems
> like I greatly underestimated the power of this feature, even if the
> concurrency issues I've mentioned in this thread would be left unaddressed.
>
> I haven't looked at the patch yet (I plan to do so), but +100 for this
> feature.
>
Thanks for your feedback. I'd be interested in any ideas on the
concurrency issues.
> Should we expect a new patch any time soon?
>
I hope to look at this again tomorrow.
I'll try to post an updated patch then, with some real trigger code,
but without addressing any of the concurrency issues.
Regards,
Dean
