Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTika0ZWQO0aYgdct_N7XarVCvj1eGZZRRH9uGfRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> >>> AFAIR nothing's been done about it, so it's a TODO.
>> >
>> >> I was thinking of adding it to the 9.1 open items list, but the wiki's
>> >> been down every time I've tried to go there.
>> >
>> > Since the problem's been there since forever, I don't see that it's an
>> > open item for 9.1. ?That list normally is for "must fix before ship"
>> > items, not development projects.
>>
>> OK.  If you don't feel it warrants being on that list, then the TODO
>> is OK with me.
>
> Agreed.  Do you want me to do it, or will you?

You do it.  :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: disposition of remaining patches
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch