Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikZgbXNbzhCkYonl8-_zIrR5Wq3eRc5KXIHRuXJ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?  (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
> 22.Haz.2010 tarihinde 06:43 saatinde, Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir@gmail.com>
> şunları yazdı:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Carlo Stonebanks
> <stonec.register@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any technical obstacle to anyone creating PL/PHP? I am cruious as
>> to why it doesn't alreay exist. I mean, I love my Tcl support, and I know
>> this is part of PG's legacy... but Tcl and no PHP? I figure there's a tech
>> reason for this - the demand must be there! No?
>>
>
> There is one already: https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/plphp
>
> IIRC, it does not compile against newer PostgreSQL releases and it is not
> under development right now.

I recall talking to the guys at command prompt and apparently
something in the php runtime makes it unsuitable for pl deployment.
Been a while, I don't remember what, just that the php folks had no
interest in fixing it.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem Using RowType Declaration with Table Domains
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: High Availability with Postgres