On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:
> Didn't PostgreSQL used to have more than 1 storage engine in the past?
> I thought I read somewhere it did, but it was decided it was a
> compromise on stability and/or quality, so ended up using a single
> kick-ass engine?
Yes, many, many moons ago.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company