Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikS_a2wBnVray3irbwsNgBD48kZg87Wd-wvCeFv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> I vote for % .
>> I'd vote for %>, out of those.  Reason: the operator isn't commutative,
>> in fact left and right inputs aren't even the same datatype, so a glyph
>> that looks asymmetric seems more natural.
> Lots of operators aren't commutative. Arithmetic % for example ;-)

I've committed this as % -- if anyone cares about it enough to keep
arguing, we can change it again.

> I think this bikeshed is going to be more paint than shed.

You said it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept
Next
From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump does not honor namespaces when functions are used in index