2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a
>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance.
>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to
>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't
>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes
>> all things possible.
>
> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables...
I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.
--
Hitoshi Harada
