Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TCP keepalive support to libpq. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TCP keepalive support to libpq.
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikMo-t5XLnbbF84tDfKZSaZ5UzKDoE00LdakuYi@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TCP keepalive support to libpq.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Add TCP keepalive support to libpq.
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> It might be a good idea to add a sentence to the documentation, though,
>>>> just pointing out that these control client-side keepalive probes rather
>>>> than server-side.
>>>
>>> Yes please. I was confused; I think others will be also.
>
>> Do either of you have any thoughts about where would be the best place
>> to add such a sentence?
>
> In the hunk you added to libpq.sgml would be fine by me.

Well, the trick is that the hunk that I added is really four separate
sections, and adding a whole sentence to each one seems like overkill.
 Here's an attempt at rewording the sections so that the information
is included in each parameter's description without taking up a whole
sentence.

Thoughts?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TCP keepalive support to libpq.