Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search - Mailing list pgsql-general

From zhong ming wu
Subject Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikK1Mft93efVHDTf8p3DXW0JYVhE6pWr3Dsyt9G@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  (Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com>)
Responses Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  (Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39@yahoo.com>)
Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com> wrote:
> Thanks to some very helpful input here in earlier threads, I was
> finally able to pull together a working prototype Full Text Search
> 'engine' on PostgreSQL and compare it directly to the way the
> production Oracle Text works. The good news is that PostgreSQL is
> bloody fast! The slightly iffy news is that the boss is now moaning
> about possible training costs!
>
> For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here:
> http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153

I always thought there is a clause in their user agreement preventing
the users from publishing benchmarks like that. I must be mistaken.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sachin Srivastava
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres-8.4SS, pg_dump from macosx-10.6 has "ssl handshake error" 26% in
Next
From: Greg Williamson
Date:
Subject: Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search