Re: buffercache/bgwriter - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Uwe Bartels
Subject Re: buffercache/bgwriter
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikJior7Sout7JKxc==gE5UaXJPNYYNWceUxOUxB@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buffercache/bgwriter  (tv@fuzzy.cz)
List pgsql-performance
Hi Thomas,

thanks, but there were no new informations in there for me.
this article http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/chkp-bgw-83.htm I know and others on his website.

Best...
Uwe


On 23 March 2011 15:41, <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have very bad bgwriter statistics on a server which runs since many
> weeks
> and it is still the same after a recent restart.
> There are roughly 50% of buffers written by the backend processes and the
> rest by checkpoints.
> The statistics below are from a server with 140GB RAM, 32GB shared_buffers
> and a runtime of one hour.
>
> As you can see in the pg_buffercache view that there are most buffers
> without usagecount - so they are as free or even virgen as they can be.
> At the same time I have 53% percent of the dirty buffers written by the
> backend process.

There are some nice old threads dealing with this - see for example

http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Bgwriter-and-pg-stat-bgwriter-buffers-clean-aspects-td2071472.html

http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/tuning-bgwriter-in-8-4-2-td1926854.html

and there even some nice external links to more detailed explanation

http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/chkp-bgw-83.htm

regards
Tomas


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: tv@fuzzy.cz
Date:
Subject: Re: buffercache/bgwriter
Next
From: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)"
Date:
Subject: Re: buffercache/bgwriter