On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Am 14.10.2010 08:52, schrieb David Newall:
>>
>> On 14/10/10 12:14, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>>>
>>> Which solution is better? Or, another idea?
>>
>> This does seem to be an new bug in previously working code. While any
>> solution that fixes the problem is good, it might pay to look the code
>> that worked before. As reported, it worked for ecpg (PostgreSQL 8.3.8)
>> 4.4.1.
>
> You seem to be answering to an email that I didn't see and couldn't find in
> the archive either. Was it send in private or to the list? If it went to the
> list I might be lagging behind.
I didn't get it either. The original report was posted to pgsql-bugs
on October 10.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
