Re: PostgreSQL FDW update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PostgreSQL FDW update
Date
Msg-id AANLkTik6EwaO+gMSkX4pwHx0Ayn8K_fgNOdR0ntLHeyT@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL FDW update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL FDW update  (Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> I needed something to test the FDW API patch with, and didn't want to
>> get involved in the COPY API changes, and also wanted to have something
>> that needs real connection management and can push down quals. So I
>> updated the postgresql_fdw patch to work with the latest FDW patch.
>
>> Here. It's a bit of a mess, but it works for simple queries..
>
> I'm going to set this CF item back to Waiting on Author, because (a)
> there doesn't seem to be an actual concrete patch presented at the
> moment, only a stack of hard-to-follow deltas, and (b) the patch
> certainly needs updates for the extension mechanism and committed
> FDW API anyway.

Is anyone actually working on a new version of this patch sufficiently
rapidly that we can expect a new version in the next day or two?

If not, I think we mark this one Returned with Feedback and revisit it for 9.2.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Void binary patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SR standby hangs