On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-09-03 at 16:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Part of the reason it's sat on TODO is lack of consensus about how
>> such a feature ought to look/work; particularly since most of the
>> discussion about it has considered that it'd go along with stored
>> procedures executing outside of transactions.
>
> I would probably be a mistake to tie these features together. They are
> tricky enough separately.
Hm, do you think it would be possible to request manual transaction
state when setting up the procedure (or reserve that ability for the
future)?
merlin
