Re: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTik4KaAe0dAhzKu2DLV-iW-gV2LbEyZbSVGLcRfx@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: archives, attachments, etc
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the
> attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a
> horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments
> that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the
> string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute.

I wish our super admins would have some time to resume the work on the
new archives infrastructure, that was about ready for integration if not
prime time:

 http://archives.beccati.org/pgsql-hackers/message/276290

As you see it doesn't suffer from this problem, the threading is not
split arbitrarily, and less obvious but it runs from a PostgreSQL
database. Yes, that means the threading code is exercising our recursive
querying facility, as far as I understand it.


Something looks wrong with that thread. The message text in my mails is missing. Perhaps that is contained in the .bin files but I can't tell as the link leads to 404 Not Found.

Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)
Next
From: James Cloos
Date:
Subject: Re: .gitignore files, take two