On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Err... wait. Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to
>> remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether. I don't think it's actually
>> used for anything. For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as
>> we do for indexes and sequences. I think that's just leftover crap
>> that I failed to rip out.
>
> OK. I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching
> all those same places anyway.
Excellent, thanks!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
