On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>>> You forgot to attach the patch. :-)
>
>> Attached.
>
> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no?
It used to be =>
After much bikeshedding, we renamed it to %
After more bikeshedding, we decided to remove it altogether, hence the
present patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
