2011/1/21 Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>:
> On Jan21, 2011, at 03:29 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out
>>>> of it?
>>
>>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
>>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what
>>> was passed through, not what was removed.
>>
>> I think it's pretty common to use the phrase "filtered out" to identify
>> the stuff that gets removed by the filter, as opposed to what gets
>> through. So we could possibly use "Rows Filtered Out: nnn". I still
>> think that's more awkward than "Rows Removed: nnn" though.
>
> "Rows Skipped: nnn", maybe?
+1. Very straightforward to me.
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
