On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 17:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Before I go ahead and commit the part that adds
>> log_replication_connections, anybody else want to object to the idea?
>
> I think it'd make more sense just to say that replication connections
> are subject to the same log_connections rule as others. An extra GUC
> for this is surely overkill.
I thought so, but Robert didn't agree. And given that things are the
way they are, clearly somebody else didn't agree as well - though I've
been unable to locate the original discussion if there was one.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
