On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:40, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:49, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah that sounds like a good idea. Shouldn't be too hard to do (will
> reuqire a backend patch as well, of course). Should we use "-f" for
> fast? Though that may be an unfortunate overload of the usual usecase
> for -f, so maybe -c <fast|slow> for "checkpoint fast/slow"?
Was easy, done with "-c <fast|slow>".
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
