Re: system views for walsender activity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: system views for walsender activity
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=o9rvDzYV9PEV=PF5iNqZDP0bkeM80mR__8MWh@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: system views for walsender activity  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 20:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
>>> object...) during beta.
>
>> Why?
>
> So that beta testers won't be forced to do a dump and reload.
>
> When and if pg_upgrade is actually 100% trustworthy, maybe the desire
> to avoid initdb's after beta1 will vanish completely; but for now it's
> still a good thing to avoid.


I think it's still a good thing to avoid. It's at that point no longer
as necessary, but it's still best if we can avoid to make those
changes after beta when possible.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: pg_dump directory archive format / parallel pg_dump
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: system views for walsender activity