On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [ abject plea for reviewers ]
>
> [ second abject please for reviewers ]
OK, I believe I've sent an off-list email to everyone who volunteered
to review and asked me to assign them a patch, which totaled 11
people.
If you got an email of this type, and the patch you were assigned is
OK, then please go to commitfest.postgresql.org, edit your patch, and
put your name next to it so other people know you've grabbed it. Then
review it and post your review on -hackers. Then add a comment to the
patch with your review and mark it as either Waiting on Author or
Ready for Committer.
If you did not get an email of this type and want one, email me and
I'll assign you a patch.
If you are a committer or an experience reviewer looking for a
challenge, please pick up a "hard" patch and review it, as many people
are not up to picking these up. Some good choices: Change
pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards (is this safe?),
SSPI client auth on non-Windows systems (needs Windows expertise), FDW
API (complicated), Range Types (also complicated), ALTER EXTENSION
UPGRADE (needs design comments as well as code review).
At this point, our goal should be to get all patches that are marked
as "Needs Review" to either "Waiting on Author" or "Ready for
Committer" as quickly as possible. All help is appreciated!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
