On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I have finished a first run of benchmarking the current 9.1 code at various
> sizes. See http://www.2ndquadrant.us/pgbench-results/index.htm for many
> details. The interesting stuff is in Test Set 3, near the bottom. That's
> the first one that includes buffer_backend_fsync data. This iall on ext3 so
> far, but is using a newer 2.6.32 kernel, the one from Ubuntu 10.04.
>
> The results are classic Linux in 2010: latency pauses from checkpoint sync
> will easily leave the system at a dead halt for a minute, with the worst one
> observed this time dropping still for 108 seconds.
I wish I understood better what makes Linux systems "freeze up" under
heavy I/O load. Linux - like other UNIX-like systems - generally has
reasonably effective mechanisms for preventing a single task from
monopolizing the (or a) CPU in the presence of other processes that
also wish to be time-sliced, but the same thing doesn't appear to be
true of I/O.
> I think a helpful next step here would be to put Robert's fsync compaction
> patch into here and see if that helps. There are enough backend syncs
> showing up in the difficult workloads (scale>=1000, clients >=32) that its
> impact should be obvious.
Thanks for doing this work. I look forward to the results.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
