Re: git: uh-oh - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: git: uh-oh
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=P2=SjJbe5Cf-NRqbyDMvxdr964pDjrznXV7Ki@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: git: uh-oh  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: git: uh-oh
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 19:46, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 19:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>> Ok. I've got a new migration runinng. Here's the revisions removed:
>>>> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Attic/gram.c,v
>>>> deleting revision 2.88
>>>> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/Attic/pgc.c,v
>>>> deleting revision 1.2
>>>> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/Attic/preproc.c,v
>>>> deleting revision 1.6
>>>
>>> Hmm, it looks like you deleted the file deletion events (the versions
>>> cited above).  Not sure this is the right thing.  Check to see if the
>>> files are still there according to the converted git history ...
>>
>> Oh, drat. That's right. It shouldn't have been inclusive :S
>>
>> I'll abort the conversion and run it again :)
>
> Ok, I've pushed a clone of the new repository with these modifications to:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=git-migration-test.git;a=summary
>
> Haven't had the time to dig into it yet, so please go ahead anybody
> who wants to :-)

That definitely didn't fix it, although I'm not quite sure why.  Can
you throw the modified CVS you ran this off of up somewhere I can
rsync it?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Farm Release
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry