Re: Extensions, this time with a patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=NLxrB5TjUmpD8Zhqg1HSqcgYGAC2XEwnsR558@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>> Sure. The reason to do it, though, is so that extension authors can create
>> just one metadata file, instead of two (or three, if one must also put such
>> data into the Makefile).
>
> That's a good idea, but my guess is that the implementation cost of
> supporting the control format in your perl infrastructure is at least an
> order of magnitude lower than the cost for me to support your current
> JSON file format, so I lean towards you having an automated way to fill
> in the json file from the control one...

Ah, truth to power.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains versus arrays versus typmods