On 28 March 2011 02:31, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> My sense is that for basic read/write/update/delete the driver
>> works just fine. However I'd like to compile a list of everyone's
>> gripe.
>
> At the top of my list is the need to use a cursor to avoid
> materializing the entire result set in heap during execution of an
> execute method. Pulling data off the wire should be done in
> ResultSet.next() method.
Do you mean something beyond the batching you can do by setting a
suitable fetchsize?
Or do you mean you want to lift the restrictions on when that batching
can actually be used?
Or something else?
Oliver
