On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we can outline Major Features and Innovations separately. This
>> release is notable for the number of genuinely new ideas implemented,
>> so that's worth making something of even if the advanced features
>> themselves need a little more explanation. Or Perhaps have
>> "Innovations" as a major feature and then a comma list of the names of
>> them.
>
> Yeah, that sounds like the way to go.
>
> So for Innovations, we'd have SSI, SE/Postgres, KNN-GiST, and wCTE, no?
> Or does someone else have wCTEs? I vaguely remember something about
> SQL Server ...
wCTEs are definitely in SQLServer 2008
I would add Sync Rep also, since the transaction-controlled part is
new and original.
> There's also another obvious grouping: Extensibility. This would
> include both Extensions and SQL/MED.
>
> So we could have:
>
> Features
> Sync Rep
> Per-col collation
> Unlogged tables
>
> Innovations
> SSI
> KNN-GiST
> SE/Postgres
> wCTE
>
> Extensibility
> Extensions
> SQL/MED
>
> I like that, it means we can list everything but without having a long
> laundry list which nobody will read.
Key Features
Innovations
Extensions
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
