On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 14:45, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 21:46, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:39:54 -0400 2010:
>>> On 1 September 2010 21:34, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>> > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:22:22 -0400 2010:
>>> >
>>> >> I'm coming round to the idea that if we wanted such a table of
>>> >> contents, we'd generate it on the page when building the docs rather
>>> >> than running some ECMAScript. I've already got a basic contents thing
>>> >> showing on my version of the docs (see
>>> >> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/9.0/static/functions-xml.html ),
>>> >> but I'm not happy with it. It looks out of place and there doesn't
>>> >> seem to be any appropriate place to put the link to show it.
>>> >
>>> > How does this effort relate to
>>> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B7EA23A.1000705@archonet.com ?
>>>
>>> I think the problem with that is that it doesn't seek to build the
>>> extra table of contents into the docs, but my script does appear to be
>>> a duplicate effort, so even more reason for me to abandon it ;)
>>
>> Well, at least get *something* out there and have it committed on the
>> website and/or the PG CVS .css file, before moving on and fiddling with
>> a floating TOC or whatnot. And if you're going there, by all means talk
>> to Richard :-)
>
> Yes, I've committed changes to a forked git repository. :)
And I've committed $self to merging these changes when we're done ;)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
