Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=7S7zPE9FmOpfFQRyaNUgGFFKy3udNyEFBXWXv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  (Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com>)
Responses Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr@diznix.com> wrote:
> Thanks to some very helpful input here in earlier threads, I was
> finally able to pull together a working prototype Full Text Search
> 'engine' on PostgreSQL and compare it directly to the way the
> production Oracle Text works. The good news is that PostgreSQL is
> bloody fast! The slightly iffy news is that the boss is now moaning
> about possible training costs!

Someone running Oracle is complaining about training costs?   That
seems a bit like complaining about needing to give the bellboy a $1
tip at a $1k a night hotel.

> For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here:
> http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153

Cool, I'll read up.  Thanks.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Howard Rogers
Date:
Subject: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Next
From: Sandeep Srinivasa
Date:
Subject: Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ?