On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are two things that I think are pretty clear. If the receiver
>> has wal_receiver_status_interval=0, then we should ignore
>> replication_timeout for that connection.
>
> The patch still doesn't check that wal_receiver_status_interval
> is set up properly. I'll implement that later.
Done. I attached the updated patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
