speaking as someone currently migrating enterprise stuff to postgres....
point-in-time is definitely the biggest issue.
this is the main thing we are having to look reproducing using some form of
replication to an alternative server.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Gigger [mailto:rick@alpinenetworking.com]
Sent: 22 January 2004 19:09
To: Cott Lang; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:05, Brian Maguire wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, it really is a critical feature to support and administer
> > enterprise databases. All the major databases currently support this
> > and it is a compelling enough reason drive big users from away from
> > using postgres for their enterprise/large databases. It really is a
> > database administrator's feature.
>
> It seems to me that the lack of point-in-time recovery is a much bigger
> roadblock against big users. :(
This is certainly my feeling.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
