> On 10 Nov 2025, at 02:11, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> While looking at a recent patch for injection points that has resulted
> in 16a2f706951e, I have been reminded that the point name, library
> name and function name have hardcoded limits, and it is now possible
> to have them tested by SQL.
While they do increase code coverage, which is a good thing, it seems somewhat
unlikely that they will catch bugs given the nature of of the code being
tested. That being said they come at a low cost so no objections to add.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
