Re: Query with large number of joins - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Igor Neyman
Subject Re: Query with large number of joins
Date
Msg-id A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70ECAB2FDF18@mail.corp.perceptron.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query with large number of joins  (Marco Di Cesare <Marco.DiCesare@pointclickcare.com>)
List pgsql-performance

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marco Di
Cesare
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 4:03 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan; Merlin Moncure
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Query with large number of joins


On 10/21/2014 12:31 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Please don't top-post on the PostgreSQL lists. See 
> <http://idallen.com/topposting.html>

Oops, sorry.

>Have you tried a) either turning off geqo or setting geqo_threshold 
>fairly high b) setting join_collapse_limit fairly high (assuming all the above join targets are tables and not views,
settingit to something like 25 should do the trick.
 

I did try various combinations of these settings but none yielded any significant query run time improvements. 

> You also haven't told us what settings you have for things like effective_cache_size, which can dramatically affect
queryplans.
 

effective_cache_size = 4096MB

I tried bumping this up as well but again no significant query run time improvements.  



Marco,

Didn't you mention, that you have something like 48GB RAM?
In this case (if that's dedicated db server), you should try and set effective_cache_size around 40GB (not 4GB).

Regards,
Igor Neyman

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Marco Di Cesare
Date:
Subject: Re: Query with large number of joins
Next
From: Montana Low
Date:
Subject: ERROR: out of memory | with 23GB cached 7GB reserved on 30GB machine