Re: pg_listening_channels() - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Igor Neyman
Subject Re: pg_listening_channels()
Date
Msg-id A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70EC08F068FE@mail.corp.perceptron.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_listening_channels()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_listening_channels()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:13 PM
> To: Igor Neyman
> Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_listening_channels()
>
> Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com> writes:
> > With PG 9.0 changes I lost ability to check if anyone is interested
> in the NOTIFY signal and payload I'm about to send.
> > Seems like this change was not thought through completely.
>
> [ shrug... ] It was debated extensively and the advantages of the new
> implementation were deemed to outweigh the disadvantages.
>
>             regards, tom lane

Tom,

Are you saying that these two features: attached payload and being able to find which channels are being listened to -
areincompatible?  That they cannot coexist? 

Regards,
Igor Neyman



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mike Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: When does CLUSTER occur?
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: youtube video on pgsql integrity