Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Date
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17CFF1B6@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-performance
I wrote:
>Jeff Janes wrote:
>>>> All that said, there has always been a recommendation of caution around
>>>> using NFS as a backing store for PG, or any RDBMS..
>>>
>>>     I know that Oracle recommends it - they even built an NFS client
>>>     into their database server to make the most of it.
>>
>> Last I heard (which has been a while), Oracle supported specific brand named implementations of NFS,
>> and warned against any others on a data integrity basis.
>
> I couldn't find any detailed information, but it seems that only certain
> NFS devices are supported.

For the record: Oracle support told me that all NFS is supported on Linux,
regardless of the device.  "Supported" does not mean "recommended", of course.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Next
From: Сурен Арустамян
Date:
Subject: SELECT outage in semop