Re: Heartbleed Impact - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: Heartbleed Impact
Date
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17CF1056@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heartbleed Impact  (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Heartbleed Impact  (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dev Kumkar wrote:
>> Unless somebody changes the setting to ssl=on, there should be no problem.

> Thanks also please help to understand - does changing this postgresql.conf setting enough to be
> vulnerable here?

Just changing the setting will only cause your database server to error
out on restart - you also need to create certificates and put them into
the server directory.

So whoever does this change must know what they are doing (to some extent).

Once SSL has been enabled, a cunning attacker may be able to steal
the server's private key (if I understood the vulnerability correctly)
and then launch man-in-the-middle attacks, i.e. impersonate the server,
to eavesdrop on encrypted communication.

The remedy would be to create a new key pair for the server.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Heartbleed Impact
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Heartbleed Impact